The whole point of democracy is to create a governing system with inherent checks and balances so elected officials do not succumb to the addicting temptations of money and power. Democracy is designed to ensure accurate representation of constituents’ needs and desires.

If one accepts these 2 statements at face value, one can see the allure of considering modifications to our antiquated, often ambiguous 244 year old design. Incentivization is how we maintain governance that truly works for the people. If we create sound incentives, elected officials will serve their true purpose.

To maintain a healthy and effective democracy, it’s important to examine the incentive structure within our government. Taking an honest look will bring up hard questions, but if we face them head on, we can build a system that works for all, one that promotes freedom, fairness, and prosperity.

Some concepts we can review: campaign finance—what should be allowed when politicians seek election? How much influence do the wealthy hold over current political campaigns? Are there basic rules that can ensure political campaigns are free from influence? Congressional terms—Should the same person be allowed to serve in government for 50 years? (Should there be a limit on the number of terms one can serve?) What work schedule and salary/benefit structure is appropriate for a congressional representative? What salary range will motivate someone to run for public office with the purpose of serving the people? Is a 2 year term for a member of the House too short? (Are representatives constantly seeking re-election instead of getting work done?). Performance accountability—How can we hold politicians to their campaign promises? Would a bonus structure incentivize the accomplishment of key objectives? How bills become laws—Is there a way to ensure bills fundamentally address one issue at a time? Is there a way to incentivize the debating of a bill without negotiating addendums or quid pro quo? The election process and voting systems—Are there changes we can make to our voting process that will eliminate the 2 party system? Are those changes reasonable? Is there a way to make voting more accessible yet also keep it safe? Would making voting day a national holiday significantly increase voter turnout?

People are not perfect. But they don’t have to be. That’s the whole purpose of creating a government system that incentivizes officials to work hard, truly represent their constituents, and achieve success through public accomplishment, not wealth or prestige. We are capable of producing such a system. And we don’t have to tear the current one down to do it. We just have to carefully and honestly review the levers of incentive that are built into the current governmental framework, and make simple modifications where deemed necessary. Protecting our democracy and its institutions might not be easy, but it also doesn’t have to be complicated. Governance is a human creation. We can improve it. Besides, regardless of its feasibility, it is our responsibility as citizens. Will we rise to the challenge?